Sunday, March 7, 2010

"PC R Parker Statement" continued, page 7

"Evans then looked directly at me then threw the knife at me. It hit me on my right foot."

What Parker fails to make mention of is the fact that I looked at him because he requested me to throw the knife (over the other side of the road) to him. He then fails to mention that when the knife was thrown over to him, the blade was closed, and the fact that it was thrown under-arm !!! Furthermore, when I eventually received the knife back from the police, I found that they had snapped the end of the blade off, presumably to make it look as though the knife had been thrown with the blade open!!! Fucking scumbags. More manipulation of the evidence, this jerk seems to have a real knack for distorting the truth.

Oh, and before we go any further, this is now Grave & Criminal Assault NUMBER FIVE, and (yep, you guessed it) I was not charged with any offence in connection!!!
"Sgt Minty and Marie Francis Healion were continually talking to Evans and were eventually able to pull Lisa Healion free."
What is this lying twat on about??? I asked Lisa if we could talk, she said yes, we then kissed. I then said to Lisa, you had better move as these clowns are going to arrest me. So how the fuck do Minty and Lisa's sister manage to pull her free !!!!!
"Evans was then approached by a number of officers and he became extremely violent, lashing out with his arms and legs. He was continually shouting threats at all officers."
How many times do we have to endure this laborious phrase? Is this the only thing Parker can say? Is this phrase also carved into the police station wall?
"During both these incidents I found Evans strength and power to be frightening."
WHY Parker? I never laid a finger on you, or any other officer, so what is there to fear???
Thank the Lord, we only have one more set of lies to come from this corrupt little twerp.


  1. The more I read of your posts the more I think you are in the wrong. You sound like a loose cannon back then so nothing to be proud of.

  2. "A Loose Cannon" If that was the case, would I not have been charged with assaulting policemen? Would I not have caused at least one injury to someone? Indeed, would I not have been imprisoned for such crimes?

    I would be grateful if you would reserve your judgement untill you have heard ALL the cases. Let us see if your outlook changes when we get to the events of 16th April 1995, or even more important, the total and utter corruption of 18th December 1995. If those events don't change your outlook, the events of 21st June 2006 surely will.

    "hear one side, be deceived. Hear both sides, be enlightened."

  3. Dear anonymous,
    So as not to paint either of us as obtuse!

    I would like to point out that this blog is not about anything that I may have/have done. I have already paid ten fold for any mistakes that I have made, and as you rightly say, nothing to be proud of (which I am not).

    However, this blog is simply about the corruption and utter malfeasance involved in bringing these cases.

    It is about policemen fabricating evidence, needless beatings, perjury, conspiracey to pervert the course of justice. It is about doctoring evidence to obtain an unlawful conviction, interfering and colluding with witnesses, rewriting evidence after the fact, wrongful and unlawful imprisonment.

    Covering up said crimes, and the general criminality of a regime that thinks it cannot be held, or brought to account for it's culpability.