Ian Evans Against Jersey Corruption And Police Brutality

"A Little Something For Christmas"

2011-12-25T00:00:00.005Z

I will resume posting on the issues this blog raises very soon. I have had to wait for some time as legal matters have dragged on for many months.

I have yet again been dumped on by the corrupt legal system in Jersey, so the battle now recommences without any further breaks.

Please click on the link below to get to my other blog

for our Christmas Spe

http://therightofreply.blogspot.com/2011/12/common-law-admiralty-law-and-your-straw.html

"My Apologies To readers"

2011-06-18T18:04:00.007+01:00

Sorry for not posting in some time but there are legal reasons for this, nothing bad I might add.

I will be resuming posting shortly.

Thank you for your patience.

In the mean time, you might like to visit the blog of Stuart Syvret
who has today released a "shocking posting" on the Jersey Police,
and Government Corruption.
Please click on the green link below for
Stuart Syvret's blog.

http://stuartsyvret.blogspot.com/2011/06/jersey-or-palermo.html

"The O'bar Incident" PC Nelson - the perjury

2011-03-06T01:54:00.003Z

Scene Two: The Police Arrive

SO, whilst the kicking of Graham Cousins was subsiding, our wonderful police arrive. I was pointed out to a police officer by a witness, Slim Miri (general slime ball/liar, and thief) that I was one of the assailants.

Indeed, I was one of the assailants. I punched Cousins twice at the outset of the incident OUTSIDE the nightclub, and never once denied it when questioned by the police. In fact, I told them before they had even asked me about my actions outside of the nightclub. I had punched him twice to put the filthy coward down, down so he could not pick up another lethal weapon to maim or kill his victim. This might sound a little far fetched, but kill, was a distinct possibility with a pint glass. Only good fortune by the merest few inches had stopped Glen Phillips having his Carotid artery severed, possibly suffering a stroke, or even bleeding to death. It takes just a matter of a few minutes to bleed to death when your Carotid artery is severed!

Anyhow, there I was, accused of being one of the gang who beat Graham Cousins, right in front of a police officer! What did police officer PC Nelson do? Well, nothing actually, nothing other than to tell me to “fuck off or I would be arrested”. My response was to tell him that “I was going nowhere until I had found my cross and chain” which Cousins had ripped from my neck a few minutes earlier. However, when in court, and under oath, PC Nelson denied my saying anything about my cross and chain?

I would love to quote, at this juncture, from PC Nelson’s statement; however, this is impossible as my lawyer had never provided me with a copy of it? And to this day, I have still not received a copy of it? There is a good reason for my lawyer not furnishing me with a copy, that reason is that another officer had (in court) concurred with my assertions, and had backed me up in Court by saying that he heard me saying I was going nowhere until I had found my cross and chain. A fact that the corrupt, PC Nelson had denied under oath!

Advocate Renouf asked PC Nelson “did he (Evans) mention a cross and chain to you?” PC Nelson replied “No Sir” Advocate Renouf then said “are you sure about that, sergeant, now?” PC Nelson replied “Yes Sir”. Advocate Renouf then asked “might you have forgotten what Evans said to you after the nine months that has passed since December 19^th?” PC Nelson replies “No Sir, No Sir”.

PC Robert Alan De La Cour stated under oath that “Mr Evans was in dispute with another officer who was trying to get him to leave. Mr Evans, however, was concerned about a neck chain that he had lost somewhere near the front step of the O’bar.”

Advocate Renouf then asked, “who was the other officer? Can you remember?”

PC Robert Alan De La Cour stated under oath “PC Nelson, Sir”. Pc De La Cour then goes on to say “he just kept saying that he had lost a neck chain, and PC Nelson was telling him to leave and he said he was refusing to go until he found his neck chain.”

Advocate Renouf also said to PC Nelson “PC De La Cour told us that Evans was in dispute with you, and that Mr Evans was concerned about a neck chain he had lost.”

PC Nelson responds under oath that “I know nothing about a neck chain”. And again “nothing about a neck chain”.

WPC Alexandra Le Chevalier also recalled me going on about my cross and chain. Advocate Renouf asked her “did you hear Ian Evans speaking, even shouting, about the fact that he had lost a chain, a neck chain?” the WPC replied “Yes”.

Also, the head doorman, Sean Brennan, remembers the incident about the chain. He states under oath that “a grey headed policeman, dog-handler, was actually having an argument with Mr Evans”. The prosecutor then asks “can you remember what the argument was about?” Sean Brennan replies “the policeman was asking him to move back from the actual step, and he (Evans) was saying you’re not going to stitch me up for this. He also mentioned at the time that he had lost his chain, which I later recovered from just outside the O’bar”. Sean Brennan also states “I went down because Ian was actually saying he had lost his chain, he had lost his chain”. Advocate Renouf then asked “who was Ian Evans saying this to?” Sean Brennan replied “the grey haired policeman”. Advocate Renouf then said “PC Nelson, yes, I think it would be. That he had lost his chain.”

SO, what conclusions can we draw from the evidence given by PC Nelson?

For one, we know he is a complete and utter liar. Two, he has brazenly committed perjury in the Royal Court. Three, even when confronted with the fact that he might be mistaken about his recollections, he adamantly stated he was not wrong, or mistaken, about the evidence he had given.

Given these facts, his evidence should have been stricken from the proceedings, he should have been charged with perjury, and dismissed from the police force. But hey readers, this is “The Jersey Way”.

"The O'Bar Incident" The Story

2011-01-30T19:26:00.006Z

Section G, page 7 of 11

THE STORY: scene 1

As you are now aware, this epic (yet, unfinished) journey began at the O'bar nightclub in December 1995. This saga of grave and criminal assault, corruption, conspiracy, perjury, doctoring of evidence, etc etc, was initiated by one gutless coward known as Graham Cousins. Not content with the privileges he was born into, he decided through his cowardice and drunken bravery, to bring about vicissitudes that would impact on many people, and over many years. Not least of all, myself.

The story begins at the foot of page 7 in section G of the 11 page document that I wrote in prison. As will become clear, I have learned more than is written in this document, as obviously my discoveries have, over time, given a much wider picture of the events following the glassing of Glen Philips by the spineless Graham Cousins.

As we move through the story, I will update the relevant information in relation to the original letter as much has changed since it's creation. Matters take a rather sinister turn from the moment of arrival on the scene by the States of Jersey Police. That is the moment at which the conspiracy, and subsequent fit-up began.

Section G, page 8 of 11

Section G, page 9 of 11

Section G, page 10 of 11

Section G, page 11 of 11

"The O'Bar Incident" A vile corruption

2010-12-27T12:46:00.022Z

The Introduction:

We now move on to what can only be described as a Government Conspiracy. A conspiracy to imprison myself for a crime I had not committed, why you may ask? would a Government collude and conspire to lock up a rather insignificant chap such as myself? The answer lies in protection, the protection of five corrupt Jersey Policemen, the same five Policemen who are described in my previous posting, "The Buchannon Affair".

Andrew Smith.
Tracy Le Neveu.
Paul Whale.
Alexander MacDowall.
Keeley Wood.

The unlawful actions, and subsequent perjury by these officers, is (in reality) the reason I was imprisoned. The many people who have been drawn into this saga since it's inception, is nothing short of fantastical. These people range across the whole spectrum of Jersey Governance, the Judiciary, Appeal Judges, Advocates, law enforcement in Jersey, law enforcement in England, members and departments of the UK Government, doctors, forensic scientists, the Judicial Greffe of both the Police & Royal courts, prison officials, and even witnesses? Notwithstanding the most important in all of this, the company called Laidler/Haswell who transcribed my trial tapes.

The saga starts at the O'Bar in Gloucester Street/Patriotic Street, at the end of 1995. A gutless coward by the name of Graham Cousins (son of Diane Cousins), who for no apparent reason, tried to pick a fight with me, and then went on to glass a friend of mine in the face causing him serious injury. Cousins then received his mandatory retribution for the vile attack on Glen Phillips by way of an assault upon himself by a number of persons.

I was blamed for repeatedly kicking Graham Cousins in the face, even though the Police knew it was not me, and I had to be convicted for this crime. Why, you ask?
Well, I had filed charges against the five officers named above, and was awaiting the outcome of the investigation into my complaints against them. The Jersey Authorities were stalling on releasing the report into my complaints, and now, were suddenly presented with a chance to blackmail me, or stitch me up and incarcerate me to deter me from my pursuance of justice over these complaints. The consequences of this little ruse are as follows.

The Jersey Police refused to take my shoes at the scene, which I had asked them to do! They also refused to take my shoes when I got a taxi, from the scene, straight to the police station!

They refused to arrest me (at the scene) despite me being named as one of the assailants! One officer even telling me to "fuck off, or I would be arrested" which was what I wanted, so I could prove my innocence.

Detective Constable David Harrison re-wrote the last page of the main prosecution witness statement by a certain David Snowdon, who D.C David Harrison later conspired with, to pervert the course of justice.

Detective Constable David Harrison later destroyed one of my statements, and then claimed that "I had not even made the statement"?

Richard Renouf (middle)

At the preliminary magistrates court hearing I was saddled with perhaps, the most incompetent either/and/or corrupt lawyer that Jersey had to offer, one Richard Renouf then of (Renouf, Lempriere & Whittaker).

When in court, we had the judge, Mr T. Sowden Q.C, questioning one of the main witnesses in a language (french) that we did not understand? and no objection from any of our lawyers?

Some "nine months later", Advocate Renouf finally submitted to me, copies of all the case statements and evidence. Why was I made to wait 9 months? and only furnished with them just before my trial?

At trial, Advocate Renouf knew I had a tape recording of a witness (Sylvia Grimmes) who had alleged a conspiracy to frame me, Advocate Renouf refused to even listen to the tape, yet then, advised me to withdraw the tape? He landed me in more trouble after refusing to contact me during an adjournment in connection with the tape, and after which I was arrested and later accused of intimidating a witness by the Attorney General, Michael Birt Q.C! Indeed, Advocate Renouf should have advised me not to speak with Sylvia Grimmes, or he should have spoke to her himself.

This tape recording was subsequently tampered with by that re-writer of statements, D.C David Harrison, who later, denied having transcribed the tape after informing me in front of Advocate Renouf, that he "HAD" transcribed it?

A (new) witness at trial, Marsha Warden, had made a very detailed statement to police, just one day earlier. In that statement, she had said that she had not seen me take part in the attack against Graham Cousins. When giving evidence the very next day, and under oath, she responded to every question put to her, that she could not remember? Bearing in mind her very detailed statement of the previous day, why could she not remember? Were the Jersey Police protecting her, as they did Sylvia Grimmes?

After (not surprisingly) being found guilty, I was up for sentence where the prosecutor (Julian Clyde-Smith) gave me a better reference than my own advocate, Advocate Renouf, and indeed, praised me for my honesty at trial.

Advocate Angela P Roscouet

After receiving a two year sentence for being stitched up, I wrote the covering letter and eleven page document and began to get some support from certain members of the Jersey Government. I was also allocated a new Lawyer, Advocate Angela P Roscouet then of (Le Gallais & Luce). This new allocation of Advocate proved to be the worst possible scenario ever as Advocate Roscouet took the largest dump on me, and possibly, on a legal aid client in Jersey history!!!

When after discovering, that D.C David Harrison had doctored the tape recording of Sylvia Grimmes, and that he had re-written the last page of the main prosecution witness statement of David Snowdon, Advocate Roscouet threatened to leave me with NO legal representation at my appeal hearing if I insisted on making police corruption an issue!!! After hearing of this, my fellow prisoners nicknamed me "Briefless in Brelade"!!!

On the morning of my appeal, and five minutes before entering the court chamber , I was presented with a letter to sign by Advocate Roscouet. This was to confirm that Advocate Roscouet would only act on my behalf if I signed the paper stating that "no mention of Police corruption would be made at the appeal" ??? What choice did I have but to sign? But I did so in front of two witnesses!

During my appeal in front of the three Q.C's from England, J. Nutting, J. Sumption and J. Collins, I was drawn to certain sections of the transcripts from which they were reading. Mr Nutting was reading things out to the court, that were NOT even in the transcripts that I possessed!!! It was on return to prison after my failed appeal that I started to look into these matters.

After some long days and nights (in my cozy little prison cell) working on my transcripts, I discovered that they had in fact, been doctored!!! I informed Advocates David Le Quesne & David Le Cornu of this discovery as they were looking into my case on behalf of the Jersey Law Society.

I eventually decided to request a trip to listen to the trial tapes (which was ok'd) at the Judicial Greffe. The Judicial Greffe at the time was one, Ian Le Marquand. I was asked to supply a list of the extracts that I wished to listen too. However, having furnished Ian Le Marquand with the list, I was then flatly refused permission for the visit to go ahead. I wonder why???

My consolation prize was for Ian Le Marquand to send me some copy tapes of my trial, which I had to accept. On listening to the tapes, I discovered that a number of sections of the oral evidence were missing from the copy tapes. This prompted me to contact a Mr K. Budding of Laidler/Haswell Ltd, the company who transcribed the original trial tapes.

Mr K. Budding checked and confirmed to me by fax, and telephone, that the transcripts were a very accurate and precise copy of the tapes with which he was supplied.
He also confirmed that he was NOT SUPPLIED WITH THE ORIGINAL TRIAL TAPES, bagged, tagged and sealed!!! BUT SECOND HAND C90 CASSETTES???
Mr Budding further instructed me that Jersey had not sent ANY ORIGINAL TAPES for the preceding 18 months!!! Strangely, this was right around the same time as the sentencing policy on drug dealers had doubled! You may draw your own conclusions on why no original tapes were sent again, but I would submit that it really doesn't take much working out, does it?

After all of my discoveries, I wrote a lengthy list of complaints against the police, judicial greffe, advocates, and others. These were taken up by an honourable Lady named Barbara Myles, the Lieutenant Bailiff, and head of the Prison Board of Visitors who was already familiar with my case. Mrs Myles set about the initiation of an investigation that was to be taken out of the hands of Jersey's corrupt Police Force.

It was decided by those unknown to me, that CI Dennis & Insp Rogers of the Avon & Somerset Constabulary would be looking into my complaints of corruption. By this time I had amassed all the evidence required to prove my innocence, and duly passed this to the two investigating officers. Many months later, as I was nearing my release date, the investigation file was submitted to the Attorney General of Jersey, Mr Michael Birt QC.

Mr Birt flatly refused me a copy of the report, and any information as to the findings of the investigation? This went on for a considerable period, and as I had been released from prison, I think it was hoped that I would forgive and forget about matters. A view that was reiterated by Advocates Le Quesne & Le Cornu who I felt were trying to influence me into letting the matter drop.

Since then, I have been informed by the Attorney General Michael Birt, that NO evidence of any wrongdoing was ever found!!! Again I requested a copy of the investigation report, and was refused. I then applied for legal aid to gain access to the report. I was allocated Advocate Peter Harris, who for a whole year, dragged his feet on the issue. The only positive from Advocate Peter Harris was the fact that we managed to obtain a letter from the Attorney General, Michael Birt QC stating that all the evidence would be saved, and that the investigation report would not be disclosed on the grounds that "IT WAS NOT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST" !!! And we all know what that means, don't we?

SUMMARY:

Indeed, it took some time for me too work out what exactly was going on, and why? Of course, unless you have been through the Jersey system, and possess the intellect to reason out each corrupt manoeuvre made by the Jersey Authorities, you have very little chance of ever finding the answers.

This story encompasses corruption and cover-up at the highest level in Jersey. It is a damning indictment of how a parochial community band together in the face of threats of exposure to a world wide audience.

The evidence is to follow, and in great detail.

"The Buchannon Affair" the epilogue

2010-05-31T21:47:00.005+01:00

Since finishing the "Buchannon Affair" postings, I have been pulled in the street about this blog topic by a number of members of the public, and friends and associates of Stuart Buchannon.

Most have come out with phrases like "you could really screw his employment up" and "the police will harass him now". Well, for one, I am sure that Stuart does not live in Jersey anymore, and if he does? So?

Sorry, but I just don't get it!
What Mr Stuart Buchannon did in this case was totally and utterly commendable.

These comments only serve to endorse the (climate of fear) argument that many of us in Jersey are fighting to eradicate. The fear of being honest and telling the truth, is that so bad? Just because the truth happens to be against members and employee's of the Establishment, does not make it wrong or an error of judgement.

Stuart Buchannon went against the grain, and he went against a good friend of his (Pc Andy Smith) who he knew had committed crimes against two innocents! Where is the dishonour in that?

Stuart Buchannon (through his selfless integrity) saved Paul McAvoy from his first criminal conviction for a crime he had not committed. The ramifications of Stuart's actions are imponderable as Paul may have wished to emigrate in the future, or seek employment with some company that required a clean criminal record? Did these five scumbag Jersey Police Officer's think about that when they tried to stitch Paul McAvoy up for a crime he had not committed? NO!!!

Stuart Buchannon, through his honesty and sheer human decency, also saved myself from going to prison for crimes that I had not committed. Again, did Jersey's finest think about that when they tried to stitch me up? NO!!!
All they thought about was protecting themselves and their colleagues from conviction for crimes they had committed.

So, if Stuart Buchannon is harassed by the Jersey Police, I and a number of my allies will be on it like flies on shit!

Furthermore, I would like to point out that any potential employer of Stuart Buchannon would hire him in a minute after reading this blog!!! WHY? Because any potential employer would recognise what an upstanding, honest, forthright person Stuart Buchannon is!!! What company boss would not want a workforce full of people of the calibre of Stuart Buchannon?.... Only the Jersey Establishment and Police, that I can think of.

In short, Stuart Buchannon has done nothing in this case but show us what a real man he is. To those of you who think he did the wrong thing, your judgement is truly clouded indeed.

I shall be indebted to him for all my life, and with the greatest of respect.

THANK YOU STUART BUCHANNON

"The Buchannon Affair" The 'filthy rag' Reports!

2010-05-03T19:40:00.012+01:00

So the filthy rag (jersey evening post) sticks its oar in, and gets it wrong again!

Can't even get the judges name right!

Says that, "no prosecution evidence was offered" ha ha, aaahhaahh haahaha ???

Doesn't mention the charge of assaulting a female police officer!

Doesn't make any mention of the tape recording!

Nothing about the Police perjury!

It is as though they have been complicit in hushing this case up!

Is it any wonder that the Jersey public have no idea what Stuart Syvret has been banging on about for the last 20 years!!!

"The Buchannon Affair Summary" Advocate Lakeman and the Judge

2010-05-03T16:50:00.014+01:00

So there we have it, Police corruption to the point of committing perjury!

I will now go through matters with my Advocate and the judge, which I believe were designed to protect the five police officers from facing any charges over their crimes.

So, we are in court and four policemen have lied under oath. Pc Andy Smith, after testifying that he had never had the conversation with Stuart Buchannon, is then spoken to by the judge. The judge then says "if you never had the conversation, how is it that Mr Evans has a tape recording of it?" or words very similar.

The Centenier presenting the case, then jumps up at this point and utters that immortal line "The Police offer no evidence?" How can the police offer no evidence when they have just finished standing in the witness box and given their evidence? It was at this point that I was expecting Stuart Buchannon to appear and give his evidence, but there was no sign of Stuart, why not?

Now, here's the trick!!!
How could the judge possibly have known that I had a tape recording of Stuart Buchannon telling me what officer Smith had said? The Centenier didn't know, the police didn't know, only myself, Stuart and Advocate Lakeman knew! Stuart was not present at court, and I did not tell the judge of the existence of the tape, so it can only have been Advocate Lakeman! Further more, Lakeman must have colluded with the judge before the trial began. What kind of lawyer would do such a thing? A corrupt one.

So now we have the prosecutor wanting to throw the case out. He is wanting to do this without hearing the tape recording, or even reading a transcript of the tape recording? WHY? The judge then adjourns the case for some months? Again, WHY?
Should not the proper procedure have been to call Mr Buchannon as a witness, for him to give his evidence and to admit the tape recording as official evidence? Then to allow the policemen a chance to refute the evidence and question Mr Buchannon!

The reason for this failure (I believe) to not legally admit the evidence, was to protect the police from prosecution for perjury and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. I think it is beyond doubt that this has been the case, if anyone can enlighten me as to any legal reason why this was not done, I am all ears.

We are now back in court, some months later. The judge then throws the case out on the grounds that he is "concerned about the length of time the case has gone on for?" He, the judge, is the one who made it go on as long as it did by adjourning it in the first place? And why, exactly, was it adjourned anyway? And for so long?
SIMPLE, that was the only way the Establishment could get themselves out of the mess they were in, and without Mr Buchannon being called as a witness against the police.

What should have happened in any lawful jurisdiction, is this. The judge should have immediately ordered a full and independent inquiry/investigation into the conduct of these police officers. The findings should then have determined whether or not myself and Paul should have been acquitted, and whether or not, the police officers should have been charged with any offences?

But truthfully, such is the lawlessness in Jersey, that this outcome was never going to be on the cards. The only real (half) apology we ever got was when we went to claim our expenses, a Mr Austin Vautier told us that "the judge was very sympathetic to our case." Obviously not sympathetic enough to do the right and lawful thing though? Which would have been to have these police officers prosecuted.

Following on,

1/ We have to ask why Advocate Lakeman would not call Stuart Buchannon as a witness?

2/ We have to ask why there was no transcript made of the tape recording?

3/ The mere fact that Advocate Lakeman states that he did not have to see Stuart Buchannon, is indicative of a cover-up. No statement taken from Mr Buchannon, why ever not? This has to be unprecedented in legal circles?

4/ We have to ask why the judge did not insist Mr Buchannon testified?

5/ Why did the judge adjourn the case for months?

6/ Why did the judge not sanction any investigation into the police?

7/ The fact that Stuart Buchannon had never even attended court shows that the Jersey Authorities had already decided the outcome of this trial, well in advance of it beginning!

The Attorney General (on my complaints)

1a/ The A.G, Mr M. Birt QC states of my complaints that....
"you duly made a complaint against the police alleging verbal abuse, a number of assaults and wrongful arrest."

1b/ I also made complaint of four counts of perjury and five counts of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice!!! Why does the A.G not make any mention of these facts when whitewashing my complaints, for the second time???

2a/ He then goes on to say "The matter was investigated by Inspector Upton, who prepared a report for my consideration. I concluded that there were no grounds for instituting criminal proceedings against any of the officers concerned."

2b/ So, we can conclude from the Attorney General's findings....

That Stuart Buchannon was lying?
That officer A. Smith never had the conversation with Mr Buchannon?
That four police officers never perjured themselves?
That five police officers never conspired to pervert the course of justice?
That five police officers never lied in their statements?
That I was not assaulted?
That myself or Paul were not unlawfully imprisoned?
That we were not maliciously prosecuted?
That the Centenier had, in fact, let two criminals off the hook?
That the judge was utterly incompetent in letting us off?
That the judge was wholly wrong to tell Mr Austin Vautier that he had sympathy for our case?
That we have in fact, illegally claimed expenses, and indeed, been granted those expenses?

THIS READERS, I AM AFRAID, IS THE SUM TOTAL OF JUSTICE IN JERSEY....NONE!!!

"My Thoughts On Tape 3"

2010-05-03T15:51:00.002+01:00

This tape transcript highlights another identical case and reinforces the facts that are now obviously clear.

Page One

1/ Stuart says "I've not said you've threatened me, I've already been asked by the police, if you've threatened me, I says, there's been no threats handed out."

Page Three

1/ S. Comer says "It happened with me with the coppers. They stand up first and deny ever having the conversation, then the tape gets produced and then Martin Stokes has, well he had to put in a sworn statement in then, saying that they did have the conversation."

Page Five

1/ Stuart says "At the end of the day, I can't deny it Ian, if its on tape."

2/ I then said "I just want the truth Stuart, nothing else. You don't need to stand there lying for me and saying things he never said. I just want the truth, what you told me on two occasions."

"The Buchannon Affair" tape 3

2010-04-25T14:37:00.008+01:00

This tape confirms the Police conspiracy against myself but also highlights another (identical) case wherein the Jersey Police employ the same methods to gain an unlawful conviction through lies that were told by the police.

This other case was dealt with on appeal by P. Bailhache in the Royal Court. The plaintiff (after paying for his own lawyer) was acquitted, and the Policemen involved, received NO PUNISHMENT for their conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, and their fabrication of evidence. Just another Jersey Tale? Tape 3 is also integrated into the player in the top right hand corner of this blogs home page, just click fast forward twice.

"The Buchannon Affair" transcript of tape 3

2010-04-18T19:50:00.010+01:00

"My Thoughts On Tape 2"

2010-04-16T18:38:00.007+01:00

My Advocate, Christopher Lakeman, is now in possession of the first tape recording, and matters are beginning to look a little suspect. I will elaborate more as we go through the transcript of this tape, as the actions of my lawyer begin to make me feel uneasy.

Advocate Lakeman told me (immediately after listening to tape one) that there was a very good chance that I would still be found guilty? What did he know that I did not? This tape was gold dust, one could not have wished for better evidence yet my own Advocate is implying that it is virtually useless! What bizarre behaviour for your own Advocate to display, but I suspected there would be a huge cover-up to protect the bent coppers that had lied under oath.

PAGE ONE

1/ I said to Stuart "did he (advocate Lakeman) give you a transcript of the tape?"
Stuart said "no, he never gave me the transcript." I then asked "why not?"

The answer was obvious though, Advocate Lakeman had no intention of making a transcript, and never did make one. I believe that (even at this early stage) the case was already destined to be swept under the carpet. I will wager that the second I left his office, he was onto his buddies at the law officers department.

PAGE TWO

1/ I said, "my brief never told them (the police) anything that was on the tape."
I should have cottoned on at this juncture that something was badly awry, but I didn't.

2/ Stuart then says "and your lawyer says the tape can't be played in court, it's something to do with Jersey Law."
Something to do with Jersey Law? If the tape cannot be played in court, how do we know that the tape even exists? I never cottoned on to this little stunt either! not admitting the tape as evidence.

PAGE FOUR

1/ Stuart says "your lawyer says to me, has there been any threats? and I says no, there's never been threats."
This statement had me worried as I had already heard rumours that people were saying Stuart had been threatened into making the tapes! The only way now, that the police could cover up this little inconvenience.

PAGE FIVE

1/ Stuart then says "well at the end of the day, I would say somebody is trying to stir the shit then Ian."
Damn straight Stuart, and we can guess who!

2/ Stuart says "If there is any threats, I'll be honest, I'll go straight to the police about it Ian. Cos I've, I've going to court cos I've been tricked, and at the end of the day, I am going to court too tell the truth."
I would say that this statement is proof enough that Mr Buchannon was not threatened, and that the conspiracy by the police is genuine.

PAGE SIX

1/ By now, I had twigged what was going on and asked Stuart the following question.
"How many times have the coppers asked you?"
Stuarts reply was "If Ive been threatened"
How did Stuart know what I meant by the last question?

2/ Stuart says that a Sergeant asked him "have there been any threats?"
Stuart then replies "to be quite honest, NO."

PAGE SEVEN

1/ Stuart then repeats (after being asked again) "there's been no threats to me, my family or friends, any shit like that."
Then the Sergeant asks him yet again! "are you sure."
Stuart replies "I'm a hundred percent sure."
The deaf/corrupt Sergeant, then tells Stuart "well, an Inspector will get in touch with you about that?"
I hope you readers understand now, the depths that the Jersey Police will sink to to prosecute me, or to save themselves.

2/ Our corrupt Sergeant then persists "an Inspector would be in touch within the next day or two."
Clearly, the Jersey Police have already got their plan of action worked out. That plan is to get Stuart Buchannon to say that I threatened him into making the tapes and that he complied under extreme duress. They would then be in a position to get themselves out of the crap they were in, and prefer more charges against myself!!! Yes, I would have been charged with many more offences, perverting the course of justice, to name but one.
They were even prepared to make an Inspector complicit in this web of corruption and conspiracy, how else would our corrupt Sergeant know that an Inspector wanted to talk to Stuart?

The one, single, tiny detail that buggered up their entire corrupt little charade, was this!
STUART BUCHANNON IS AN HONOURABLE, DECENT, HONEST TO GOODNESS, HUMAN-BEING. THIS THOUGHT HAD NEVER ENTERED THOSE POLICE MEN'S TINY LITTLE MINDS.

3/ Stuart goes on to say "Andy Smith told me this, one night erm, what/whats been said on tape is what I've been told, and your lawyer says he will prompt me on a few things."
He might well have prompted you Stuart, but he knew you would never get to court!

PAGE EIGHT

1/ I ask Stuart if my lawyer took a statement off him, Stuart replies,
"NO, he says he didn't actually have to see me."
Can any sane person be asked to believe that a lawyer would not want to see a witness who corroborates the assertions of his client, especially against the word of five police officers ?????
Of course Lakeman is up to his eyeballs in this conspiracy, how the hell could he not be?

I think the evidence really does speak for itself, especially in this case, total corruption!!!

"The Buchannon Affair" tape 2

2010-04-16T17:40:00.004+01:00

Our next tape (tape 2) and set of transcripts 2, deals with the even more disgusting manner in which the Jersey Police try to encumber their victims. In tape 2, I will demonstrate how the Establishment try to cover up their lawless behaviour by trying to "fit the victim up" with even more charges! Not possible you think! over the top you think! well, just listen and read and be astounded....IT HAPPENS.

Tape two is integrated into the tape one player, top right hand corner of the home page. Too play tape one, click play. Too play tape two, click the fast forward button and it will play automatically.

"The Buchannon Affair" transcript of tape 2

2010-04-15T23:24:00.011+01:00

"My Thoughts On Tape 1"

2010-04-15T21:44:00.007+01:00

Let us look now at some of the aspects of tape 1.

PAGE ONE

1/ Mr Buchannon states that Pc Smith says that "some woman copper had wound you up" and "she was out of order winding you up" this is as I told the story from day one.

2/ How is it that Mr Buchannon knew the Christian name of the Wpc? I only prompted him on the surname, so it is clear that Mr Buchannon must have had the conversation with Pc Smith!

3/ "Basically, you were minding your own business at the time/or you were ready to fuck off on your own without causing any grief." This is exactly how it was.

4/ "you know what they're like though, they all fuckin close ranks straight away." This is so true, and is eventually, exactly what happened.

PAGE TWO

1/ He says "I think I get on alright with Ian" he says "I felt a right cunt being there." A true statement of guilt, if ever I heard one.

2/ "I knew him before he joined the Pozzies." This is an important part of the recording, because officer Smith stated in court "that he was not friends with Mr Buchannon."?

3/ "he would never give anything up, nor give anything away." Mr Buchannon, you know him, and the police, so well!

4/ He says "they was out of order, what was done, yeah" he says "it was fuckin naughty/definitely/without a doubt." Mr Buchannon then goes on to say "getting him to say that in a courtroom is another fuckin ball game." It sure is Stuart, as matters proved!

5/ I then said "I'm not pleading guilty to something I haven't done." NO, too much of that in the past as readers are fully aware.

PAGE FOUR

1/ "they had to fucking nick you for something, didn't they." Yes, that was the only way that they could cover themselves, how very sad it was too.

2/ Andy says "they had to nick you that night, for something." He just says "Oh, I knew everybody had to nick him."

3/ Stuart then says "being a copper he'll lie in court." This guy really does know the Jersey Police inside out, wow.

PAGE SIX

1/ "Your joking, and he got nicked for that?" and "Oh, that's a fuckin joke" and "can't believe, that's fuckin bang out of order." As you rightly remark Mr Buchannon, it certainly was bang out of order!!!

All things said and done, I think this tape speaks volumes about the Jersey Police and the disgusting manner in which they stitch people up like the proverbial kipper. Rest assured people, this is no one-off case. This happens day in, day out in Jersey, it is known locally as "The Jersey Way"....

"The Buchannon Affair" tape1

2010-04-14T01:11:00.009+01:00

So, here we have the first of three tape recordings in this case. All that I have said in the eleven page document is true, these tapes go some way to giving my assertions credibility.

I hope that my readers will now begin to understand the utter lies and corruption that The States of Jersey Police employ. It only gets worse from here on in, so be prepared for a few shocks. This is just the start.

PLEASE GO TO THE SIDE BAR (top right) OF THIS PAGE TO PLAY THE RECORDINGS.

"The Buchannon Affair" transcript of tape 1

2010-04-12T23:01:00.006+01:00

"The Buchannon Affair" summary of transcript 1

2010-04-12T22:07:00.007+01:00

There has been an assertion from our wonderful Policemen at Rouge Bouillon Police Headquarters.
This assertion centres around their speculation that I had threatened and bullied Stuart Buchannon into these tape recordings, and forced him to comply with my wishes to frame the police officers concerned.
So, let us look at (and dissect) the evidence that is on offer.

1/ How could I possibly know that Stuart Buchannon's best friend (Pc Andy Smith) was an officer involved in this case, indeed, how could I even know that they were friends?

2/ The only reason that I knew Mr Buchannon was pals with Pc Andy Smith is the fact that both parties must have talked about the case, otherwise, Mr Buchannon would have never approached me in the first instance?

That is enough for now, we shall revisit later.

I must add however, that I transcribed these tapes whilst in prison, and with very poor equipment. This transcription is (under the circumstances) a very accurate representation of what was said on the tape.

"PC Andrew Smith Statement" page 4

2010-04-06T06:32:00.009+01:00

Phew! that is all the police lies (err, statements) now taken care of.

How about some real, impartial, honest to goodness truth now? That would be a most welcome change wouldn't it?

So, let us see what we can conjure up shall we?....

"PC Andrew Smith Statement" page 3

2010-04-06T06:13:00.002+01:00

I was then bundled into the police van,

"along with McAvoy who was calm and was in no way aggressive."

What a truly strange thing to say about Paul, if he was so calm and well behaved, why was he arrested?

Because he was also a witness, that's why! They had to arrest and charge him so too deter him from backing me up that I had been punched and sworn at, by an out of order Wpc Le Neveu. It's another filthy little police shit trick that usually works. I will demonstrate this little ruse in a future case, it keeps potential defence witnesses from testifying in court.

"PC Andrew Smith Statement" page 2

2010-04-06T05:55:00.003+01:00

"Evans then walked directly towards the male pushing Wpc Le Neveu with his body. Wpc Le Neveu told Evans to leave the area but Evans ignored her and just walked into Wpc Le Neveu again. Evans was verbally abusive to Wpc Le Neveu and shouted that she had assaulted him."

Please note the way Pc Smith and Co keep referring to the alleged (body pushes). Any psychiatrist worth a nickel would tell you that the constant references to this point are all indicative of rehearsed conspiracy. Far to accurately described by all policemen concerned, and indeed, the only point accurately described.

I am not wasting any more time on this page, as the lies of Pc Andy Smith will be made as clear as crystal very shortly.

"PC Andrew Smith Statement" page 1

2010-04-06T05:43:00.003+01:00

"On our arrival one male was seen walking very quickly up to Wpc's Le Neveu and Wood being pursued by Ian Evans."

That is now, all the other officers who totally refute the evidence given by Wpc Wood, that she radioed for assistance. If she had radioed, the other officers would have stated that they were responding to a call for assistance!

The woman is an out and out LIAR.

"SGT Charles MacDowall Statement" page 5

2010-04-06T04:38:00.010+01:00

Ha Ha Ha....

"Evans remained abusive and aggressive throughout the detention process."

Now where have we heard that before, OH YES, in every statement ever compiled by the utterly maleficent States of Jersey Police.

I would like to point out at this stage, the little scribbles and arrows in these statements where not made by me. They were made by an Advocate called Ashley Hoy, who I was going to privately pay to represent me. This was because of the absolutely appalling service that I had received from previous Advocates under the Legal Aid System in Jersey.

Mr Hoy listened to the tape recordings of Mr Buchannon and myself, then set about making points of reference on the statements. He described these statements to me as "utter nonsense, not fit to be put to a Court of Law."

He then, shortly afterwards, refused to represent me saying that I should go with Legal Aid as I could not lose my case. I didn't lose. So, my next question was, if I could not lose, why is this Advocate unwilling to represent me?

It crossed my mind that perhaps Mr Hoy may have telephoned the Legal Aid office to inform them they had a man who was going to win his case, coming to them. This is not a statement of fact, it is just my thoughts on the matter, nothing more.

My eventual Advocate however, was the corrupt Christopher Lakeman, an Establishment Man of Loyal Pedigree. Matters will become clearer as we progress through this case.

Ha Ha Ha....to the laughing policeman.

"SGT Charles MacDowall Statement" page 4

2010-04-06T04:18:00.005+01:00

Ha Ha Ha....

"Evans remained extremely aggressive and abusive referring to me as a little prick."

Well Sgt MacDowall, you got that spot on, "A Little Prick." The first and only time in the entirety of your statement, you have spoken the truth, well done.

The rest of this page is taken up with MacDowall's lies about me threatening to get his wife and kids. The same wife and kids that I didn't even know existed???

Please see 11 page document for the details of this little charade.

Ha Ha Ha....

"SGT Charles MacDowall Statement" page 3

2010-04-06T03:49:00.004+01:00

Ha Ha Ha....

More of the the same wall etchings on this page, "physical strength and violent behaviour" and "eventually after a violent struggle".

How come the only person to ever get injured in these violent struggles, is me???

"McEvoy started to interfere with the arrest of the first man."

Again, how did he interfere? what was said? what was done?

MacDowall then goes on to say...."McEvoy was in a drunken condition."

Paul (is the same size and build as myself) and did not like to drink more than three or four pints in one night, and on this occasion, did not. His favorite tipple was (fresh) Britvic Orange with lots of ice.

Anyone who knows Paul McEvoy will tell you that he never gets drunk!!!!!

Ha Ha Ha....

"SGT Charles MacDowall Statement" page 2

2010-04-06T03:03:00.006+01:00

Ha Ha Ha....

"I could hear, and see Wpc Le Neveu tell this person to refrain from making use of foul and disgusting language."

If that is the case, why the hell does Le Neveu not mention this factor anywhere in her statement???

Now we have more of those "police station wall etchings" and I quote "I noticed by his demeanor that he was in a drunken condition" and "his breath smelt of intoxicants" and "his eyes were glazed" and "his speech was slurred". When will these imbeciles stop using this nonsensical garbage, it just beggars belief. This crap, is in every statement ever recorded by The States Jersey Police where even the slightest amount of drink is apparent.

"I then told this person to be quiet and to leave the area, or he would be arrested, to which he shouted in reply "fuck off".

Well now, why does no one else say this in their statements???

Ha Ha Ha....

"SGT Charles MacDowall Statement" page 1

2010-04-06T02:25:00.006+01:00

Ha Ha Ha.... it's the turn of the (laughing policeman) as I call him.

This is the guy that I described as "twisted and sick" in the eleven page document. You will soon see why!

"was on mobile patrol, when on driving into Minden Place, my attention was drawn to an incident."

Nothing to do with the support that Wpc Keeley Wood had radioed for then??? That is now, 3 out of the 4 officers in this case that do not mention any call for assistance? ODD!

"I saw Wpc Le Neveu being confronted by a man who was physically walking into the officer by barging into the officer and thrusting his upper body into her's."

Ha Ha Ha, "and thrusting his upper body into her's" the exact same horse crap that Le Neveu wrote, word for bloody word. Do you think this clown had perhaps, conspired with Wpc Le Neveu? His statement was written after that of Le Neveu! No surprises there then.

"I approached this person, and as I did so I could hear this man shouting, most of what I could hear consisted of foul and disgusting language, and much of the abusive language appeared to be directed at the female officer, although there were a number of members of the public close by."

Well, what was said? tell us something, anything, anything at all!!! NOPE, NOT A DICKIE...

As for the members of the public close by, why were no statements taken from them?

Ha Ha Ha, WE KNOW WHY, DON'T WE....

Ha Ha Ha....

"PC Paul Whale Statement" page 4

2010-04-06T00:10:00.009+01:00

Again, the mandatory "cracker barrel" nonsense on this page.

Evans was swearing, Evans was abusive, Evans was struggling, Evans was threatening all officer's,

Evans was the devil incarnate.

"I took no further part in this investigation."

OH YES YOU DID WHALE, when you perjured yourself in a court of law and attempted to get me throw in jail for crimes that I had not committed!!!

"What goes around, comes around." Or had no one told you this?

"PC Paul Whale Statement" page 3

2010-04-05T22:44:00.004+01:00

More of the usual clap trap on this page, but Pc Whale does confirm my assertion that Wpc Keeley Wood was lying when she stated that I "was put to the floor and both wrists were handcuffed."

She has (presumably) stated that this happened to cover the assault with the handcuffs, although no other policeman backs her up, how bizarre!

Evans "told me to get the fuck off", well yes I did, I was in agony and did not know that I was going to be handcuffed so it came as a bit of a shock.

"I wanted him to lie on the ground in order that I could apply the other handcuff to his right wrist safely and to avoid the possibility of causing injury to Evans in applying the cuff."

Hahaha, what a crock of shit, I was shouting in agony as he had nearly broke my wrist with the first cuff???

"McEvoy was also in the area and refused to leave when told to do so by Sgt McDowall. He got in the way and interfered."

He got in the way and interfered??? How? By doing what? By saying what?

Again, we get no answers or explanations from the Police. WHY NOT? Well, in Jersey the police are not required to give explanations because they do not have too answer to anyone, Including lawyers or judges. All they are required to do is stand in the dock and lie through their teeth, nothing more!!!

"PC Paul Whale Statement" page 2

2010-04-05T22:29:00.002+01:00

Nothing to report on this page.

It is just the mandatory garbage you have read in so so many other statements on this blog.

You know, the stuff that is carved into the police station walls!!!

"PC Paul Whale Statement" page 1

2010-04-04T22:39:00.007+01:00

"At approx 02.20 hrs on Sunday the 16th April 1995, I was instructed by the force control room to collect wpc Le Neveu from James Street, St Helier, and convey her to Rouge Bouillon Police Station."

OK, nothing strange there it appears.

"As I drove up Cattle Street I saw Wpc Le Neveu on the corner of James Street and Minden Place, outside Maples furniture store. As I stopped my vehicle at the junction of Cattle Street and Minden Place Wpc Le Neveu indicated that I should wait."

OK, nothing strange there either, until you remember what Wpc Keeley Wood said in her statement?

"I subsequently requested for assistance by using my radio and within a few minutes Sgt McDowall, Pc Whale and Pc Smith attended in the area."

So why does Pc Whale make no mention of the fact that a request for assistance was sent? All he states is that he was on a designated, pre-arranged pick up. No mention of a call for urgent assistance !!!

"WPC Keeley Wood Statement" page 2

2010-04-04T20:31:00.005+01:00

"Evans was put to the ground by the officers at the scene face down. His hands were placed behind his back whereby he was handcuffed."

What is this woman on? The officer who slammed on the first handcuff states that I was stood up, so do I, and so do other officers so how can I have been on the ground???

"Unfortunately during the time of the incident, the alleged victim had left the area."

Alleged victim? could she be talking about the same guy (and his pal) that had threatened myself and Paul with harm, a few minutes earlier? Hmmm.

"At 02.30 hrs I was on foot patrol in the area of West Centre."

Ha ha ha, at 02.30 am, everyone else who she has mentioned was at the end of James Street, some 400 yards down the road, arresting myself and Paul???

"Upon speaking to Mr O'Neil, (the alleged victim) it was established that he had been threatened by Evans over a minor matter."

HOW was it established? DID HE TELL HER SO? Did it not cross this officers narrow little mind, that he may just have been lying!!! Perhaps (like many officers in the Jersey Force) she is psychic!!! What was THE MINOR MATTER that she has mentioned???

"At the time of the incident in James Street, there were a number of people in the area."

OH, THAT'S GOOD. Some independent witnesses? but alas, NO. Another snide trick of the Jersey Police is not to take independent witness statements when an officer has done wrong. THIS IS FOR THE OBVIOUS REASONS, they might just tell the truth!!!

Nope....this is, I'm afraid, another prime example of a corrupted Jersey Police Officer displaying her utter contempt for truth, honesty, and justice.

"WPC Keeley Wood Statement" page one

2010-04-04T19:49:00.004+01:00

"The male appeared upset and disturbed whereby he pointed towards a male who was behind him and stated that the male was bullying him."

Well, that's news to me (and officer Le Neveu) because she sure does not say anything of the sort? Le Neveu does not say that this (poor alleged) victim says anything to anyone!

"I subsequently requested for assistance by using my radio and within a few minutes Sgt McDowall, Pc Whale and Pc Smith attended in the area."

We will save the above phrase for a little later on, remember it.

"Evans continued to be abusive and started waving his arms about."

What a complete load of cobblers, this is just getting silly now!

"WPC Le Neveu Statement" page 4

2010-04-02T20:38:00.003+01:00

"Evans continued with his abusive behaviour so Sgt McDowall placed him under arrest."
Sneaked up behind me and slammed a handcuff on as hard as he could, you mean?

"The accused became very aggressive and had to be forcibly restrained by several officers."
Not even worthy of comment.

"At the same time another male had arrived at the scene and was attempting to interfere."
This male was Paul, who was there from the start, and had not just arrived? The only thing Paul said through the whole incident was there is no need to speak to him like that. For his trouble he was also arrested and charged, after being told to fuck off by Le Neveu.

"I had no further dealings with the accused." OH YES SHE DID, when she lied under oath in a court of law!!!

"WPC Tracy Le Neveu Statement" page 3

2010-04-02T20:13:00.002+01:00

"In an attempt to defuse the situation I placed my hands down by my sides."
Ha ha ha, the only person inflaming the situation was herself, by assaulting me, swearing at me then finding herself in the position of being the one being accused!

"however the accused still continued to try and push past me, pushing against me with his body."
Another total and utter pack of lies. What really happened is she walked into me and said, "right that is assaulting a police officer" !!! Then I was pounced on from all angles by the officers.

"As Evans is considerably bigger than me and from the smell of his breath had obviously been consuming alcohol." SO WHAT ??? Why do the police always make out that it is some sort of crime to have a few pints?

"and was in a very aggressive mood, I felt extremely threatened and frightened."
So frightened that she punched me and told me to fuck off, and then told Paul to fuck off, then brazenly walked into me and accused me of assaulting her, an assault that I was eventually charged with.

"WPC Tracy Le Neveu Statement" page 2

2010-04-02T17:41:00.003+01:00

"It was quite apparent to me that the first male was concerned for his safety."

How is this apparent, may I ask?

"At this point Evans tried to push past me, he appeared to be in a very agitated state. I attempted to calm Evans down however he was extremely irate."

Err, no he wasn't, he was quite calm and was asking the male why he was hiding behind two females! But, there we are. I am sure that by now the readers have formed their own opinion of how the Jersey police exaggerate and lie at will.

"As he tried to push past me towards the first male I attempted to prevent him and put my hands up to his chest. Evans then said if you touch me again, I'm doing you for assault."

Tried to push past her? What does she mean? If I had wanted too, I could have done so quite easily. And put my hands up to his chest? That is a little different to what really happened. The truth is that she punched me in the chest and told me to fuck off! No mention of that though!

"I told him to calm down and asked what the problem was."

WHATEVER.

"WPC Tracy Le Neveu Statement" page 1

2010-04-02T17:16:00.004+01:00

So, here we go with the first police statement in this case.

Wpc Le Neveu was the instigator in this case, her lies, bullying and outrageous behaviour set about the chain of events that led to four police officers perjuring themselves. This being, in total contradiction to everything that the police are supposed to stand for.

"The first male looked very concerned and distressed as he reached us."

Oh, there we go, some more of that sensationalism we talked about earlier. Distressed? How? In what way? Was his voice trembling? Was he trembling? Did he pee his pants? WHAT!!!

"The Buchannon Affair" The story

2010-04-02T15:54:00.004+01:00

"The Buchannon Affair" Section F (the shit hits the fan)

2010-03-25T17:03:00.009Z

Well folks, it's the 16th April 1995 and here we go with some REAL EVIDENCE, and not just the conflicted, run of the mill, lunatic waffling's of the Jersey Police backing each other up to the hilt.

In this section we have the statements of the five police officers, we have the story as told by myself of what ACTUALLY HAPPENED !!!

The offending officers are as follows:
Pc Andy Smith

Wpc Tracy Le Neveu

Pc Paul Whale

Sgt Charles McDowell

Wpc Keeley Wood

What we also have is the evidence of a truthful, and indeed, honourable man who was a very good friend of one of the police officers (Pc Andy Smith) involved in this shocking tale of collusion, conspiracy, bullying and perjury.

Furthermore, we have the sheer malfeasance of a Judge and an Advocate (my advocate?) who have colluded in this case to protect the five corrupt police officers from perjury charges, and subsequently, prison sentences.

Judge Terry.C.Sowden Q.C
Advocate Christopher Lakeman

Also, we will be featuring the recordings and transcripts of Stuart Buchannon's evidence. This will give the unbelievers much to ponder on and will give you a clear insight into the corrupt workings of Judges, Advocates, and the States of Jersey Police.

We will be finishing off this case with the representations, or rather, lack of them, by our so called "Accredited Media" who did (as per usual) the bare minimum in reporting this case to the Jersey public and the outside world.

So, settle down with a good stiff drink and soak up some of the fine Jersey Corruption on offer!

"Section E, The Evil Policemen"

2010-03-23T21:36:00.006Z

I have now had my little tantrum (which was allowed). We shall now revert back to type and do things with a clear mind, and the hefty stick of justice. REAL JUSTICE, not Jersey Justice!

Section E, arises out of my Fiancee and young son disappearing from Jersey with no word, the reasons for which, have still not been made clear to me. This section is on pages 4 and 5 of the eleven page document and should be read first.

My Points Of View & Questions

1. Why send me away to worry myself sick for two days when they knew the truth from the outset?
2. Why could the police just not say, we know where they are, and that they are both safe?
3. Why, when I rang Kingston Police, and they subsequently faxed the Jersey Police, did the Jersey Police refuse to co-operate with the Kingston Police?
4. Why did they lie to me by telling me that Lisa had flown to Heathrow, when she had flown to Ireland?
5. Why refuse to fax Dublin Police Station, it would have taken two short minutes and given me some peace of mind?
6. Why would they laugh at me and mock me about something like this. My family was missing and could have been floating in a canal for all I knew?
7. Why say to me "just face it Ian, she fucking hates you". This is the last thing you need to be told in this situation?
8. Why arrest me for swearing at them when they had just done the exact same to me?
9. Why should the police get away with their disgusting treatment of myself, and the assault and perjurious statements that must have followed, but were not handed to me?
10. Why is it that the only person to give a damn was the Irish Policeman, when I went back the next night? (Many thanks to you Sir, a gentleman)

The Attorney General's Take On The Matter

1. "You allege that the police were un-cooperative and dishonest over the state of their enquiries".
Err, hello, where they not? Their phone records would have proved this fact as would the sound and video evidence from their reception area? Was this checked? Destroyed probably!!!

2. "you further allege that you were assaulted by police officers at police headquarters when you insulted them because of their alleged lack of co-operation".
I see Mr Birt, it is fine for them to insult me in the first instance then, is it? The assault that took place must have been caught on the outside camera's of the police station, were they checked? Destroyed probably !!!

3. "your complaint was investigated by superintendent Le Brocq".
Is this the same Le Brocq who (I believe, at the time) was being investigated for corruption, for tearing pages out of his note book? and who was(I believe) fired for said offence?

4. "I concluded that no criminal proceedings should be issued against them"...."and the complaint was therefore recorded as unsubstantiated".
Unsubstantiated? If the evidence that was on offer was ignored or destroyed, yes it would be, wouldn't it !!!

SUMMARY

The evidence was there for viewing. It was either viewed and destroyed, or just destroyed. The latter being the obvious scenario.
There was no need for the Jersey Police to have treated me in this manner, they did it only in the hope that I would react, and I did! BUT WHO THE HELL WOULD NOT HAVE ?

PICTURE YOURSELF IN THIS POSITION, WHAT WOULD YOU HAVE DONE, I ASK YOU ?

"My Summary Of Section D"

2010-03-22T01:37:00.006Z

Well, what do you think? Just who is the wolf, and who is the lamb?

It certainly sounded bad from the police point of view didn't it. Is Ian Evans really that evil?

I will let you decide, but, please take on board the facts whilst deliberating on your opinion.

I believe that I have shown you all a catalogue of lies from police officers in this case, that cannot be in dispute. Furthermore, I was not charged with any offences in connection with the many alleged Grave & Criminal Assaults on police officers, or indeed Lisa. Other than Pc Langlois (2 very minor scratches), no police officer reported any injury.

Many of you will have no concept of just how corrupt and ethically bankrupt the regime in Jersey is. You will have no idea of just how low they will stoop to get you if they do not like you, or if your face does not fit. Stay with me on this, because I will provide the evidence.

These last cases are the ones referred to in the covering letter of the 11 page document. I stated therein, that I had little or no evidence for these cases. To the trained eye, a lot of this evidence is damning. To Joe Public, it takes some doing to get your head around.

I will leave you with two thoughts:
1. Lisa testified in court that "she had never even seen a knife".
2. Sections C & D came about because (section C) I had a piss late at night, and (section D) because I wanted to talk to my ex-girlfriend Lisa.

I was obviously set up by the police as I should have been arrested at the harbour's immigration control when detained. Mountains out of mole hill's, and police over-reaction springs to mind.

"Summary From The Attorney General Mr M.Birt QC"

2010-03-20T23:26:00.004Z

Well, the A.G sums thing up in sections C & D, in only a way that an A.G can.

He words things beautifully so that it makes me look bad and stupid, that is indeed his skill, his trade, it's what he does for a living.

Myself, I am a carpet fitter so can only learn from my mistakes, my intellect, and analysis of events, laws etc. But by God, I am learning as you will undoubtedly see as we move through the cases.

The A.G will make me look stupid and inadequate again, in this next case. But, it will be the LAST TIME THAT HE DOES.

"PC M Gateley Statement" continued, page 4

2010-03-20T23:11:00.003Z

Lets see if officer Gateley can come up with "anything" remotely constructive or accurate on his last page!

"He may have been left with the handcuffs still on on this occasion but cannot recall."

Well, there you go folks, enough said. What the hell can you do with a policeman that cannot remember a God Damned Thing?

Answer: Send him back to primary school. I REST MY CASE.

"PC M Gateley Statement" continued, page 3

2010-03-20T22:41:00.002Z

Hmmm, Pc Gateley yes, this is the idiot that cannot remember anything from the night before? i.e "but do not recall using my (stick) at all". Oh well, lets see what we get from him tonight shall we!

"Evans was threatening officers at the scene who moved in and restrained him."

Wow, is that it? I guess so, this is the sum total of officer Gateley's observations at a crime scene that allegedly involves a crazed man holding a knife to the throat of a young woman and indeed, threatening to cut her throat?

It's no wonder that people laugh at The States of Jersey Police, is it ???

"PC M Journeaux Statement" page 2

2010-03-20T22:23:00.003Z

"A couple of minutes later I was standing 6 to 8 feet away from Evans cell door when I received a sharp blow to the right temple. I then saw a cigarette lighter land on the cell floor, it had broken on impact with my head."

It landed on the cell floor did it? How the fuck did it do that? I was inside the cell, and you were outside the cell. Are you trying to say that the lighter went through a nine inch square hatch then bounced back through the hatch and fell on the floor in my cell??? IDIOT.

"I received bruising and swelling as a result of this."

Then where in God's name is the police surgeons report, where are the photographs, and why was I not charged with any offence in connection???

Pc Martin Journeaux, your just a liar....

PC M Journeaux Statement" page 1

2010-03-20T22:08:00.003Z

"I assisted Pc S.Bisson in removing the handcuffs from this man."

This is true, unlike the crap that Hayes has just come out with.

"Evans was noticeably under the the influence of intoxicants and was in a pugnacious mood."

Why has Pc Journeaux started lying? Pugnacious meaning "ready or up for a fight". I was calm and tearful, was I not? or is it the other coppers that are lying?

"PC A Hayes Statement" continued, page 5

2010-03-20T21:55:00.003Z

"On arrival the violence and struggling continued and he was carried into a cell, searched and the hand cuffs removed before the door was closed."

Well there's an oddity? a few posts back it was three different officers who took the hand cuffs off some time later, after I had calmed down, according to them!!! and remember that I was calm and tearful and talking to Sgt Le Seuer!

Pc Adrian Vincent Hayes, your just a liar....

"PC A Hayes Statement" continued, page 4

2010-03-20T21:13:00.003Z

"I noticed also that there were 2 females at the scene one of which seemed to be trying to get away from Evans and telling him to calm down."

Seemed to be telling him to calm down? SEEMED! does this copper not deal in facts?

"He was trying to take hold of her arm and she was pulling away."

Well, there we go, other officers state that I had my left arm around her chest and a knife to her throat!!!

"This violent and aggressive behaviour continued and he was arrested and restrained."

What an absolute crock of shit. If a copper on the mainland had put this statement in as evidence, the case would have been thrown out and he would have been fired.

Jersey Rank Amateur, cannot even lie properly.

"PC S Langford Statement" continued, page 5

2010-03-20T18:26:00.005Z

"Evans had thrown his lighter at us through the cell hatch which had missed us and struck Pc Journeaux."

Yes true, but on his left leg. At least no mention here of the infamous bump/bruise.

"Whilst standing outside the door watching Evans in his cell he spat at me on two occasions."

Spitting at someone (especially a police officer, and in Jersey) is classed as an assault, so another two reasons to charge me with crimes. Yep, you guessed it, I was not charged with any offence in connection. Even the charging officer didn't believe these lies, incredible !!!

I just cannot fathom how these people get away with such blatant lies on this island, it is imponderable.

"PC S Langford Statement" continued, page 4

2010-03-20T17:56:00.002Z

"Attempts were made to talk to Evans by police Sergeant David Le Sueur and duty Inspector Dave Ellis."

According to Insp D.Ellis, in his own statement, he was in his office? What is Langford on about?

"PC S Langford Statement" continued, page 3

2010-03-20T17:43:00.002Z

Just the usual blind and untruthful rantings of a Jersey Policeman on this page.

What is significant however, is that Langford (as did Insp Ellis) has chosen to distance himself from any mention of a knife. Any mention of knives held to throats, or even, any mention of Lisa? How Bizarre, and Why?

"PC S Bisson Statement" page 3

2010-03-20T17:19:00.009Z

"Upon approaching the cell area I could see smoke coming from Evans cell and it was soon apparent that he had set fire to his blanket."

Haha, impossible. Police Station Blankets do not, and cannot burn, they are deliberately made of flame retardant material for this very purpose. So, sorry Steve old chap, but NOT TRUE !!! I had actually set fire to some toilet paper, and then, my shirt. So why is this copper saying it was the cell blanket ? More proof that policemen will say just about anything, other than the truth.

"I then saw Evans throwing a disposable lighter through the cell door opening, which hit Pc Martin Journeaux on the side of the head causing bruising."

Again, the same lies, and not very good ones. No need to go into the police surgeon thing, and the bruise syndrome again is there!

"PC S Bisson Statement" page 2

2010-03-20T16:51:00.003Z

"At 01.58 hrs that morning I entered Evans cell in the company of Pc Martin Journeaux, Pc Thomas, and Sgt Le Suer. By this time Evans had calmed down significantly and was very tearful. I removed his handcuffs and he was spoken to by Sergeant Le Suer who told him he would be given time to calm down before allowing him a phone call."

This is actually true despite contradictions from the other officers. So there I am, handcuffs removed, calm but tearful and speaking to Sgt Le Suer. SO WHAT HAPPENED to get me all rialed up then???

Well, I will tell you. Two or three coppers stood there for half an hour taking the piss out of the fact that we (myself & Lisa) had had two miscarriages!!! Is this type of action within police mandate???

Is it any wonder then, that I totally flipped. These idiots will do anything they can to wind a prisoner up and incite behaviour to cause more offences to be committed. This is how the Jersey Police operate, ask anyone who has ever been arrested by them, they will all tell the same story.

"PC S Bisson Statement" page 1

2010-03-20T16:39:00.002Z

"The male person was by this time surrounded by police officers and was shouting at them to get their hands off him."

Really, well actually, at that time no police officer had hold of me so this is not true.

"I then saw Inspector Ellis take hold of Evans to arrest him at which he resisted violently."

Again, not true. I turned my back to them to tell Lisa to move away, then they dived on top of me, the first of which was Pc Langlois.

"PC A Bisson Statement" continued, page 7

2010-03-20T16:30:00.002Z

What more can we say ?

I will leave this LIAR with the final word on his statement.

"This statement is true." A. Bisson

"PC A Bisson Statement" continued, page 6

2010-03-20T16:04:00.003Z

"I was standing about 4 feet from the cell door when I saw Evans throw a lighter out of the cell hatch with great force. This hit Pc M Journeaux, who was standing about six-7 feet away. It struck Pc Journeaux on the side of his head and broke on the impact."

Again, this is grave & Criminal Assault, yet no charges against me. The lighter broke on impact? Err, no it didn't. When I got the lighter back the next morning, I found that the police had dismantled it to the point of even taking the wheel apart and the flint was missing!!!

"On looking at Pc Journeaux's head, I could see a bruise coming up immediately."

Whatever, anyone with even the most minimal basic medical knowledge knows full well that it takes time for a bruise to appear.

Again, why no complaint of Police Assault, no charges and no evidence from the police surgeon? ANSWER, Pc Andrew Bisson is just an out and out LIAR!!!

"PC A Bisson Statement" continued, page 5

2010-03-20T15:54:00.002Z

Again, just the mandatory rantings of threats to all officers, swearing and headbutting doors etc !

However, we do have a rather strange line at the end of this page.

"Pc Burke took hold of a fire extinguisher and placed the nozzle through the cell door, aiming it at Evans, who appeared to be alight."

Appeared to be alight??? what does he mean? In actual fact, the fire extinguisher was sprayed into my face and mouth, much to the humour of our wonderful policemen. But there we are, small things eh!

"PC A Bisson Statement" continued, page 4

2010-03-20T15:40:00.003Z

Nothing to see here.

"Insp D Ellis Statement" page 4

2010-03-12T22:33:00.003Z

The lighter had struck Pc Journeaux....

"on the side of the head with such force that a swelling was caused and the lighter broke."

Knowing this, what should Inspector Ellis have done? He should have examined Pc Journeaux himself, then ordered the police surgeon to make a full report and arrange for photographs of said injury to be taken. Yet he did nothing! WHY NOT? Because there was no injury, that's why.

As I have stated in the eleven page document, the lighter hit him on the left thigh, so he could not have had a bruise or swelling on his head!!!

We had Parker go to the police surgeon with a 4 or 5 day old bruise. We had Pc Langlois go to the police surgeon with a little scrape on his elbow and a small scratch on his neck, caused by his fellow officers.

Now we have Pc Journeaux, with a noticeable wound, witnessed by other officers, who does not bother with the police surgeon, or photographs. COME ON !!!

Who do you believe is the liar.

"Insp D Ellis Statement" page 3

2010-03-12T22:23:00.003Z

The Inspector was told that...

"In his temper Evans had thrown a lighter through the hatch and it had struck Pc Journeaux."

Well, that is Grave & Criminal Assault, what did the Inspector do about this crime?

"Insp D Ellis Statement" page 2

2010-03-12T21:48:00.002Z

"He was shouting threats of violence."

Like What ???

"After a few moments Sgt Minty managed to pull his female captive free."

Female captive? pull free? hahaha. Minty, the man of the hour, hero.

Except for the fact that he never pulled anyone anywhere, it was myself that told Lisa to move away.

I see that the Inspector has had the good sense to distance himself from the perjurious wafflings about holding knives to throats, and threats to cut throats. Indeed, this is the very reason that he is an Inspector, not as stupid as the rest of them.

"Insp D Ellis Statement" page 1

2010-03-12T21:03:00.004Z

"It was obvious that the girl was very frightened and wanted to get away."

Well, elaborate please. How was it obvious that she was frightened, and what of?

Lisa trusted me more than any bloke she had ever known, so to say she was frightened is absurd. Probably fearful for my safety if anything.

"I could see that Evans was a very large man." SO WHAT ?

If I was five foot tall, and six stone dripping wet, would the Inspector have made any mention of that factor? Of course not, it's called sensationalism.

"WPC R Le Hegerat Statement" page 2

2010-03-12T19:11:00.005Z

The next passage continues on from the foot of page one.

"I noticed that he had a knife, he was holding it in his hand but I cannot say which hand this was."

Why ever not sweetheart?

"It was near to the middle of his body."

Oh really, well, that is not quite the same as to her throat (Minty, Parker) is it people?

"I cannot say where Lisa Healion was in relation to Evans when I first saw him in possession of the knife."

I think that what she is really trying to say, is that she has had enough of lying in this case.

I think it clear that this is an honourable lady at heart, who has been sucked in by the corruption of her colleagues and has come under pressure to back up the corrupt contingent.

Boy, I would love to get my hands on her first statement, but I feel that it is lost to the annals of history, or the shredder !!!

It is a crying shame that she was not honest in the first instance, but better late than never lady. Let us hope that she has gone on to be an honourable, decent Policewoman.

"WPC R Le Hegerat Statement" page 1

2010-03-12T18:15:00.006Z

"I would like to clarify a couple of points in my witness statement."

As you have probably gathered by now, I do not have wpc Le Hegerat's original statement, I was not furnished with it.
Why not? you may ask. Well the truth is that she probably said something in it that went against what the other officers had said, so the Establishment just hide it from you, works for them. A point that I will make clear in a future case.

"I stated that Evans swung at me when I approached him."
This was probably under the (direction and advice) of Sgt D.Minty who probably tried to get her to say that I had attempted to hit her!

"He threw his right arm toward me while he was still running in an apparent attempt to push me away and warn me off from making a second attempt."
Firstly, she makes no mention of the knife that Parker and Minty say, was in my right hand?
Secondly, why is she changing her story, and in my favour when she now says "in an apparent attempt to push me away" ?

I think that WPC Mary Rose Le Hegerat has had a (crisis of conscience) and has seen this incident for what it really was, another inflammatory bout of Jersey Police bullying and corruption.

"Sgt D Minty Statement" continued, page 7

2010-03-12T03:21:00.005Z

Going to skip most of the garbage on this page as matters are growing very wearisome.

I will however comment on the last paragraph as it relates to a point I previously made at page four of Minty's statement. My Point was "looks like he also advised them on what to write in their statements."

"Direction and advice was given to Pc Parker, who was the officer delegated to deal with the case."

NO SHIT Officer Minty! Judging by the way yours, and Parker's alleged recollections of the two phrases were word perfect (page four), I would submit that this was not (direction and advice) but conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

"Sgt D Minty Statement" continued, page 6

2010-03-12T02:53:00.004Z

"he then put the knife to Lisa Healion's throat."

"whilst he continued threatening us and threatening to cut the girl's throat."

Well, Parker never mentioned this either? how odd?

"The girl was clearly terrified and distressed."

Oh hell yes, terrified enough to give me a kiss and smile! (terrified and distressed enough to come visit me in prison at the earliest opportunity and announce that she still loved me and wanted to get back together.

It is funny, but last week I was reading Senator Stuart Syvret's Blog. Someone mentioned a copper called Minty, I posed the question, is it D.Minty, is this the same guy?

The reply was "Yes it is Ian, the most corrupt policeman in Jersey." Enough said...

"Sgt D Minty Statement" continued, page 5

2010-03-12T02:33:00.003Z

"his eyes were glazed and bloodshot and I could smell intoxicants on his breath-even from the distance I was stood away from him."

Another one of those phrases etched into the police station wall, they all come out with it you know, every last one of them. Even the Judges must get bored of it !!!

"he waved the knife towards my face, shouting I'm going to fucking cut you."

This is a new one, Parker never said anything about this? Oh well, if your going to fabricate evidence, you might as well go the whole hog.

NO, THAT'S IT, Grave & Criminal Assault NUMBER SIX ??? Another five minutes and I could have reached double figures....

"Sgt D Minty Statement" continued, page 4

2010-03-12T02:04:00.004Z

"Evans turned and pointed at me, shouting fuck off, I'll kill you, I'll cut your fucking throat."

"Who then shouted at pc Parker, fuck off with the radio, I'll cut your fucking face."

I think it is amazing how these two can say exactly the same thing in this instance, yet (one minute earlier) they cannot even agree on how many hands I have??? absolutely unbelievable

Perhaps this is what Sgt Minty meant earlier in his statement, when he said "that he advised the officers of the offences that Evans had committed" ???

Looks like he also advised them on what to write in their statements!!!

"Sgt D Minty Statement" continued, page 3

2010-03-12T01:45:00.003Z

"I saw Evans speaking to the two girls (names) in what appeared to be a heated discussion."

How, pray tell, did it appear to be a heated discussion? Minty & Parker were across the other side of the road, and sat in a police vehicle? What exactly did they hear?

Opinions are not facts, and therefore, irrelevant.

"Lisa Healion was later established to be an ex-girlfriend of Evans, appeared very reluctant to speak to Evans and clearly wanted to go on their way. Evans prevented both from doing this by holding onto them both by their wrists."

According to Pc Parker, I was holding Lisa by both of her wrists? Perhaps I am secretly, an octopus? Make your minds up please !!!

"PC R Parker Statement" continued, page 7

2010-03-07T17:27:00.006Z

"Evans then looked directly at me then threw the knife at me. It hit me on my right foot."

What Parker fails to make mention of is the fact that I looked at him because he requested me to throw the knife (over the other side of the road) to him. He then fails to mention that when the knife was thrown over to him, the blade was closed, and the fact that it was thrown under-arm !!! Furthermore, when I eventually received the knife back from the police, I found that they had snapped the end of the blade off, presumably to make it look as though the knife had been thrown with the blade open!!! Fucking scumbags. More manipulation of the evidence, this jerk seems to have a real knack for distorting the truth.

Oh, and before we go any further, this is now Grave & Criminal Assault NUMBER FIVE, and (yep, you guessed it) I was not charged with any offence in connection!!!

"Sgt Minty and Marie Francis Healion were continually talking to Evans and were eventually able to pull Lisa Healion free."

What is this lying twat on about??? I asked Lisa if we could talk, she said yes, we then kissed. I then said to Lisa, you had better move as these clowns are going to arrest me. So how the fuck do Minty and Lisa's sister manage to pull her free !!!!!

"Evans was then approached by a number of officers and he became extremely violent, lashing out with his arms and legs. He was continually shouting threats at all officers."

How many times do we have to endure this laborious phrase? Is this the only thing Parker can say? Is this phrase also carved into the police station wall?

"During both these incidents I found Evans strength and power to be frightening."

WHY Parker? I never laid a finger on you, or any other officer, so what is there to fear???

Thank the Lord, we only have one more set of lies to come from this corrupt little twerp.

"PC R Parker Statement" continued, page 6

2010-03-07T16:26:00.004Z

"Sgt Minty was still trying to reason with Evans and it was during this distraction that both females managed to get out of the doorway and run off toward Minden Place."

Distraction? No No No, it was at this point that I knew I was in for another night in the cells, more trumped up charges, and another possible beating. This is the point where I (foolishly) went into my pocket, pulled out the penknife and put it to my own wrist. I then told Minty and Parker to back off or I would cut my own wrist. See how the police lie and manipulate any situation to make it sound as dire as possible.

"Evans then left the doorway and began to run toward Minden Place. As he did so I saw him going through his pockets he then stopped outside the Viceroy restaurant."

Hahaha, this is absolutely impossible! Why? well because the Viceroy is next to the doorway, and the doorway is nearer to Minden Place than the Viceroy!!! It follows therefore, that I would have to have been running in the opposite direction to Minden Place, bloody idiot.

According to Parker, I then "turned to face myself and Sgt Minty waving an arm about in front of him he shouted (I'm going to fucking cut you)."

Again, Parker is lying. It was at this point that I actually closed the penknife and put it back in my pocket, but there we are. Well there we have it folks, Grave & Criminal Assault on a police officer NUMBER THREE, and I was not charged with any offence in connection!!!

"Evans took hold of her (Lisa) with an arm across her chest and positioned her directly in front of him." "He then lifted up his free hand in which I saw he was holding a knife with the blade open and held it to her throat shouting threats and telling us to get away."

So, according to (honest John) PC Parker, this is the first time he saw the knife? Whatever. He then says that I held it to Lisa's throat, the girl I was in love with? Whatever. Oh, and before we forget, this is now Grave & Criminal Assault NUMBER FOUR, and I was not charged with any offence in connection!!!

I really am racking up the assault charges aren't I, four in the space of two minutes, WOW.

"PC R Parker Statement" continued, page 5

2010-03-07T15:14:00.005Z

"It was obvious to me from the girls actions that they wished to depart company from Evans." Ok, so how was it obvious? and what actions?

"but were prevented from doing so as Evans was restraining one of them (Lisa Jane Healion), (my ex) by the wrists."
What! this is the point where I had seen Lisa and gently took hold of the lower part of her left arm and said, "what are you doing back here, it is lovely to see you" or words very similar. The assertion of Parker, that I had grabbed both her wrists and was restraining her, is just simply not true. But is entirely what we have come to expect from Parker, say anything to make matters appear as bad as possible.

"then I saw Evans push both girls into the shop doorway." Oh really? The truth of the matter is that I had tripped over the boxes outside the doorway. Because I had hold of Lisa's forearm she had stumbled slightly when I had tripped. This does not constitute pushing two females into a doorway !!!

"I heard Sgt Minty requesting Evans to let the girls go." Why? I was not even touching them, so how could I be preventing them from leaving?

"Evans responded to Sgt Minty's request by moving toward him and pointing a finger shouted (fuck off, i'll kill you i'll cut your fucking throat)." Well, that is definitely a Grave & Criminal Assault on a police officer, if ever I heard one, and I was not charged with any offence in connection!!!

"He then turned to me and again pointing shouted (fuck off with the radio, i'll fucking cut your face)." Well, that is yet another Grave & Criminal Assault on a police officer, and I was not charged with any offence in connection!!!

"PC R Parker Statement" continued, page 4

2010-03-07T15:06:00.002Z

I thought it only fair to start with Parker's statement, after all, he just has so much to say.

What are the odds of bumping into Parker the next night? I sure don't get much luck do I?

"10th April 1993-Section D, A New Chapter"

2010-03-06T18:33:00.005Z

Hello again you lovely people, it's time for Section D.

This runs from page 3 to 4 of the 11 page document and can be found in the October section of 2009. It is advisable to read this section before throwing yourselves into the evidence, and indeed, my analysis of said evidence. The mists will clear.

Well, buckle up for another hair-raising ride into the world of lies and deceit that are, The States Of Jersey Police.

Hope you like the picture. You can draw your own conclusions as to it's significance!!!

"My Summary Of Events On The 9/April/1993"

2010-03-06T16:03:00.006Z

This is the last page on this particular event before we move on to the corruption of the 10/April/1993, (the next night).

I hope that by now, I have clearly shown what a shower of liars and bullies the Jersey Police, lawyers, judges, and the establishment are? I think it is true too say that you cannot argue with your own lies, especially when they are as well documented as they are on this blog.

There can be NO DOUBT that many, if not all of the policemen involved in this incident have lied, and/or conspired to pervert the course of justice.

There can be NO DOUBT that the police surgeon Dr M.Hommes has sided with the police, a trait that will become more obvious as we progress through the cases on offer.

There can be NO DOUBT that the judges have at best, washed their hands of any intention to weed out the truth, or indeed, to expose it.

There can be NO DOUBT that my Advocate has performed in the most disdainful manner in that none of the previous evidence even got a mention, let alone got aired in a court of law.

There can be NO DOUBT that the Attorney General has done all in his power to cover this matter up, and in doing so, shielded corrupt policemen, court officials and lawyers from the criminality that they have committed.

There can be NO DOUBT that the only hope that I ever had of a peaceful life in Jersey, was to take this abuse on the chin, and in the pocket. Keep my mouth shut about corruption, and apologise profusely for the wrongdoing of others to my person.

For this is Jersey Justice, and so, welcome to "The Jersey Way" !!!!! See you all soon.

P.S I know that members of the Jersey Police Force & The Establishment are reading this blog. If any of you would like to comment, or indeed, attempt to defend yourselves on my charges against you, I would be more than happy to publish and challenge any of your comments, especially those of the Policemen that are mentioned herein.

What is the betting that the comment numbers are zero, zilch, zip ?????

"Attorney General's Outlook On This Case"

2010-03-06T15:09:00.004Z

So let us see what Mr Birt can come up with in response to this tirade of lies and deceit
We now go back to the second response from the Attorney General, page two.

Not unreasonable you would think from reading his explanation. What the A.G fails to mention is the small matter of being emotionally blackmailed by my advocate, and the centennier who was outside court. The continuous bullying from the police, and attempts to interfere with my employment in the pubs and nightclubs.

In addition to which, we were hassled none stop by certain officers, all putting pressure on Lisa and our relationship.

Notwithstanding the undeniable fact that I was never ever going to get any justice from a system so riddled with corruption and totally devoid of human ethics and morals, that the only chance I had was to forget matters and hope I would be left alone to live in peace. This I will prove to you over the next five cases, so bare with me and be patient, the truth will out !!!

"My Letter To The A.G-Mr M.Birt" page 2

2010-03-05T22:56:00.005Z

After you have read this page, there is little left to say on this sad and sorry concoction of lies and bullshit.

I will post Birt's comments and then a summary for you all to dwell on before we dive into the murky world of section D of the eleven page document. You will just love the lies in that section.

ENJOY

"My Letter To The A.G-Mr M.Birt" page 1

2010-03-05T22:37:00.005Z

So Folks, we are nearly to the end of (section c).

This is a letter that I wrote to the Attorney General on the 12/02/1997. Remember that I am in prison now, again, for a crime that I did not commit. I wrote to Birt begging, just to be left alone, having been stitched up on five previous occasions.

As you will read, even after the vile treatment that I had received over the years, and indeed, the complete lack of justice metered out to me, I was still prepared to forgive and forget.

Are these the actions and attitude of a man that the police have just described in their statements as "vicious, extremely violent, and out of control" ???

YOU DECIDE !

"PC S Langford" page 2

2010-03-05T22:05:00.006Z

"Evans face down on the ground however inspite of this he was still lashing out violently with his arms and legs."

"With his arms"??? Most (if not all) of the other officers said I immediately put my arms under my body!!! So how many sets of arms do I have pc Langford ???

Again, I cannot be bothered with this mandatory nonsense.

However, a couple of years later this officer gave evidence against a guy I use to work the doors with. It was clearly proven that he lied in his evidence as the defendant had acquired a secret tape recording that blew this coppers lies right out of the water.

P.Bailhache threw the case out of the Royal Court. The policeman (pc Langford) never even got reprimanded, and the guy who gave the recorded evidence, was fired as manager of the nightclub. Typical Jersey Justice!!!

"PC S Langford Statement" page 1

2010-03-05T21:59:00.002Z

The usual tittle tattle on this page, not even bothering this time.

"Sgt David Le Sueur Statement" page 2

2010-03-03T22:37:00.002Z

"Evans managed to kick out with considerable force narrowly missing several officers."

Hahaha, remember the statement from the Burke a few posts back, who says I kicked Pc Hayes over, which Pc Hayes (by his own admissions) knew nothing about ???

"Evans got quickly to his feet and began to kick and hit the door with his hands and bare feet."

So what happened to the headbanging extract then? At least this guy (so far) is partially honest. What a breath of slightly more palatable air.

"Sgt David Le Sueur Statement" page 1

2010-03-03T22:06:00.004Z

Well, here we go again with more conflicting evidence. This chap is in almost total disagreement with the other officers, and actually speaks the truth in one excerpt!

"Evans, who had his hands handcuffed in front of him." Huh? "In front off him"? Now there is a new twist on the ensuing scenario. Let us proceed.

"He was placed on the floor of the cell where a search was made of his person." What happened to the (too violent to be searched) extract?

"It was necessary to place his head in the gap beneath the bench to restrict his movements." Now this bit I remember, as I questioned an officer the next morning on this tactic. The officer told me that it was a new restraint technique that had just been employed in Jersey. That then explained why I had been rammed head first under the wheel arch of the car! They were trying this new little invention out on me !!!

P.S Remember the evidence of PC S Thomas, who so thoughtfully held my head (four times) to stop me hurting myself! No mention of that here is there???

"Your Views On My Progress"

2010-03-03T21:24:00.005Z

Ha ha ha, I love this picture!!!

"PC M Gateley Statement" page 3

2010-03-01T22:55:00.003Z

"and started to kick the door violently, I looked through the glass and he appeared to be also hitting the door with his head."

"Appeared to be also hitting the door with his head." What do you mean, appeared to be? Don't you know?

And if he doesn't know, and wasn't looking through the glass, how can he know that I was kicking the door???

I think it's that "cover ass syndrome" again, you remember, the little ruse to explain my head injuries!!!

"PC M Gateley Statement" page 2

2010-03-01T22:29:00.003Z

"I am told that I used my truncheon during the task of freeing his arms, but do not recall using my "stick" at all."

"I am told", by who? Sgt D.Minty?

When were you told? whilst writing your statement in front of your friends, no doubt.

"but do not recall", Jesus Christ, this guy is absolutely bloody priceless !!!

"shouting abuse and threats to the effect of getting all officers present and killing them when free etc."

We are off again, "to the effect", and it's round two for "etc". Exactly the same crap as page one, nearly word for bloody word. Is this phrase carved into the police station wall somewhere?

"PC M Gateley Statement" page 1

2010-03-01T22:11:00.008Z

"shouting abuse and threats, saying words to the effect of killing those present if he was to "get loose" etc."

"get loose" (sounds like a quote to me), "words to the effect" make your mind up man !!! And what the hell do you mean "etc" ???

I saw the man reach for the gun and "etc" , it's just not happening is it really.

Is this person still at primary school ???

Good gravy, on to page two me thinks.

"PC Mark Burke Statement" page 3

2010-03-01T21:01:00.005Z

This statement is actually from the next night, but put in to show what Pc Hayes, didn't say or do !

"Evans then threw his lighter through the hatch which hit Pc Journeaux on the right temple. The lighter was thrown very hard."

Since when has anybody, in the history of humanity, had a right temple on their left leg???

Again, this is yet "another" police assault. Why oh why was I not charged with any offence in connection ???

The punchline comes right at the end, "The above statement is true". Better go tell that to Pc Hayes, you Burke.

"PC Mark Burke Statement" page 2

2010-03-01T20:42:00.006Z

Now for some of those promised nibbles! more like bites actually.

"at one point while he was on the floor being searched Pc Hayes was holding his legs and Evans straightened his legs violently, throwing Pc Hayes off his legs".

"Being searched", the other officers have stated that I was far to violent to be searched? What is this guy on about ???

"Throwing Pc Hayes off his legs". Why does Pc Hayes not make any mention of this incident in his statement, as it is clearly yet another police assault?

Nope, more lies from a corrupt policeman. If they are going to invent garbage like this, you would at least expect them to collaborate a little more closely!

No wonder he is called Burke !!!

"PC Mark Burke Statement" page 1

2010-03-01T20:30:00.003Z

Nothing of any real interest on this page, much the "run of the mill" with no real details to pick at.

Would have been nice if he had said which policeman it was that twisted my right foot around, but too much to expect I guess?

However, we have some nibbles to munch on in page 2.

"Sgt D.A.Minty Statement" page 2 "It's The Biggy"

2010-02-19T20:10:00.008Z

"I was concerned for the safety and welfare of the officers present. Fortunately, he was eventually handcuffed with only a minority of officers sustaining minor injuries."

The only officer on record to complain of an injury was Pc Parker? and as we have seen from the police photograph, his injury was probably four or five days old anyhoo. So, Minty old chap, who were the other officers to complain of injury ???

"I could see that where he had been thrashing about, and "bucking" his head, because of the restraint, Evans had grazed the side of his head on the floor. I am confident that this minor injury sustained by Evans was caused by his own resistance of the officers present."

Minor injury (singular) huh, and here we go again with that "cover your ass" syndrome? care to look again at the photographs of the police assault on me? The punchline comes right at the end, and I quote....

"I gave direction and advice to the officers concerned (concerned is crossed out) involved concerning the case and offences committed by Evans."

YES SGT MINTY, YOU SURE DID, we can clearly see that simply by reading the LIES of Wpc Karen Anne Bechelet (and the other officers) in my last post on this blog !!!!!!!!!!

And despite your lies, and those of all the other officers, I was still not charged with any assault in connection to your lies. Think about that one Minty ?

"Sgt D.A.Minty Statement" page 1

2010-02-19T19:45:00.007Z

This clown, in my opinion, is the ringleader for the lies and corruption in this case. The words he uses in this statement are open to interpretation, but nonetheless damning.

Minty shows a clear intention to dramatize matters to a maximum, and pressure other officers into submissions they may not otherwise have made.

This is called "bullying & criminality", not to mention "fabrication of evidence and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice" !!!

"the man who was lying face down on the floor shouting and screaming a torrent of abuse, offering very violent threats to all the officers."

Again, not a mention of one single word used in these vile and alarming threats !!! I wonder why ??? Perhaps that mental illness we spoke of earlier, has reached the higher echelons of command. Eeeek !!!

"WPC K Bechelet Statement" page 2 "It's The Biggy"

2010-02-17T19:00:00.010Z

Here we go folks, and try not to pop a stitch laughing, this truly is beyond belief !!!

End of last Para: "I returned to police headquarters where once Evans was placed in a cell, heard him bang the door (with his head) a number of times."

Hahaha aahha aahhaha aahh haaaah.

How did she know it was the door that was being banged? How in the hell could she know that the door, if banged, was being banged by my head? As if this crap is not bad enough, look at her statement!!! She has crossed out "with his head" and initialed it !!!

Anyone, owning the tiniest amount of "grey matter" would have rewrote this page. But not this idiot, this idiot has shown "beyond any reasonable doubt" that she was quite clearly copying from someone else's statement. A small case of collusion me thinks!!!

Even more frightening is the fact that no Judge, no Advocate and no Superior Officer has even made a note of this blatant and damning corruption, let alone taken steps to either correct it, or expose it !!!!!

I REST MY CASE, WPC KAREN ANNE BECHELET !!!

"WPC K Bechelet Statement" page 1

2010-02-17T18:39:00.005Z

This statement by wpc Karen Bechelet, on page two, shows the utter and complete idiocy that States of Jersey Police display. You will love it.

Para: 3 "Immediately after our arrival Evans became violent towards Pc Parker."

By this statement she is clearly indicating that when she arrived, no one was being violent!

So in accordance, we can conclude that the other three police officers were lying !!!

"PC S Thomas Statement" page 3

2010-02-17T17:51:00.004Z

Jesus, this chap really is insecure. On this page he yet again, feels the need to "cover ass" about my head injuries.

"Again, during this time, I had hold of his head to stop it striking the ground."

I was being carried to the van by God knows how many coppers, how the hell could there have been any chance of me striking my head on the ground ?

Insecure Simon, then "covers ass" a third time. "Upon entering the cell, Evans was placed on the floor so that he may be searched. During this, I again took hold of his head in an attempt to stop it from hitting the floor as he struggled."

"Evans continued to kick out with his legs causing one officer to be knocked over."...... Now that does it, why was I not charged with assaulting a police officer??? and why has this lying asshole not named the officer??? And how can you kick someone over while you are handcuffed, face down on the floor, with coppers on top of you???

As if these lies are not enough for you, this utter twat then goes for the fourth and final "cover ass session". And I quote..... "Evans got up and it appeared to me that Evans was banging his head against the cell door several times." I am so sick of this turd !!!

"PC S Thomas Statement" page 2

2010-02-17T17:39:00.002Z

On this page we have the classic "cover our own arses, lies". And I quote....

"Whilst Evans was on the floor and other officers were attempting to handcuff him, I took hold of his head in an attempt to stop it hitting the floor as he struggled."

Well Pc Thomas, how considerate of you, or are you just trying to cover up for the wounds that you and your fellow bullies inflicted on me? We know the truth, don't we.

"PC S Thomas Statement" page 1

2010-02-17T17:12:00.005Z

Nothing to get in a flap over on this page, in fact, Pc Thomas paints a picture of relative calm, up until the last line.

"I went over to Pc Parker and ascertained that Evans was being arrested and the officers were attempting to place him in the rear of the police vehicle, but due to his obvious violent behaviour, this was proving difficult."

"Obvious violent behaviour"? Err, what obvious violent behaviour? Why is this guy not stating what is happening, and how can it be violent when he refuses to describe any kind of violence! Also worthy of note is the fact that no other officer states that they were trying to put me in the back of the police car !

I hope you are all beginning to understand the garbage that the Jersey Police come out with. They do this because they know they will not be questioned on it by a judge, a defence lawyer or their own superiors.

This is exactly how unaccountable the Jersey Police are, and why they have gotten away with it for so long.

"PC A Hayes Statement" page 3

2010-02-17T16:25:00.000Z

On this page we read more evidence that the airborne strain is mutating. Eeeek !!!

"PC A Hayes Statement" page 2

2010-02-17T16:10:00.000Z

Again, the same mandatory dross for this page. No mention of bouncing my face along the road, or any mention of being rammed head first under a car! No surprises there then.

One notable point is at the foot of the page. "he was carried from the police van and directly into a cell where he was placed on the floor and searched."

Other officers have stated that I was not searched as I was so violent, can anyone help me out on this one?

Perhaps the mental illness has gone airborne!!!

"PC A Hayes Statement" page 1

2010-02-17T15:50:00.000Z

Perhaps this chap suffers from the same mental illness that Pc Angell does, but you decide!

Para: 2 continues into page two "Evans was being held.....He was constantly struggling, lashing out at any body close to him."

Oh dear! How do you constantly lash out at people when you are being held ??? It really is very sad.

Hopefully, Pc Hayes has since undergone some form of mental help therapy, he is clearly suffering.

"PC R Angell Statement" page 3

2010-02-17T15:07:00.000Z

Now this page I really enjoyed reading, it is at para: 1 that I started chuckling to myself.

"Evans took hold of Pc Parker's wrist's, and made threats, telling Pc Parker that he was going to kill himself."???

What is this lunatic on about? Why would I want to kill myself? and why do the other two officer's make no mention of this quite bizarre statement? Surely if someone had told you that they were going to kill themselves, you would remember it !!!

Para: 2 "Evans was by now extremely violent and a request for urgent assistance was made." ??? Extremely violent! Hmmm, How? I was not charged with any offence whatsoever in connection with any physical or verbal assaults? I was only charged with urinating in public and violently resisting arrest, and violently resisting arrest in Jersey is a mandatory charge, they charge everyone with it. One can only assume that Pc Angell suffered some sort of delusional mental problem.

Again, no mention of allegedly being placed on the bonnet of the police car and certainly no mention of me being bounced along the road head first. How odd!!!